In part 2 of this assignment my task was to produce a word processor document in which I had to reflect on what I had learned about: Computing with confidence and the group work involved in creating the web channel. I made quite a few mistakes here and did not use enough detail again in my answers. Below are some examples from my TMA:
I believe that for those of us who contributed to the magenta group that overall we worked quite well together. However, it did take some effort to get things going at the start. Nevertheless, once we started communicating we were able to help each other, and make good use of what experience the group had to produce our web-channel.
But you did most of it yourself how exactly did the others contribute?
In my opinion, I would say that some of the netiquette principles that we learnt were not used in the first group I was in. For example, I had arranged a meeting and no one turned up and no one even sent me an e-mail saying that they would not be there. However, in the magenta group I believe many principles were used to good affect throughout the group.
Ok, but what did you do about this did you remind them that it would have been better to at least let you know? Which principles were used to good effect?
Liked
the overall group channel (for which there were no marks here, but was an
important part of the group work, and should give you some info. for later work
(ECA). Have all the group members thanked you for doing it? Its obvious that
some didn't even bother to send the most basic details to you.
Your
own global warming- graphics start the page nicely, not OTT, just relevant to
get the reader in the mood. Simple explanatory graphics presented, so the reader
could get some idea before going to one of the links- a good idea. Links all ok
apart from the skeptics site, which I couldn't get into. But that's probably
because they are skeptics! Good variety of sites, but there are specific sites
where global warming is shown 'to be a fallacy'- not just the skeptics.
Commentaries
about the linked sites could have been more detailed- though the basics are
there. A bit more on their structure, whether they a very graphics intensive and
downloading times.
Qu.
2 comments in the text. Not enough detail. I will try and put some general info
about this in the conf. over the weekend.
Bob